Disaster is still better than AI

The author responds to Geoffrey Hinton's warning that AI could cause a large-scale incident such as a financial or power-system blackout, arguing that a visible disaster would be preferable to AI quietly becoming entrenched. He contends humans only respond to immediate pain, opposes ethical-AI and AI-safety initiatives as offsetting small dangers so AI embeds more deeply, and says even academic mathematics would benefit from being destroyed and rebuilt. He also argues tech CEOs, media and elites all have incentives to exaggerate how bad a disaster would be.