A developmental psychologist audits his own research with AI

A developmental psychologist used Claude Code to audit 79 papers he co-authored over five years, finding that 58 of 59 empirical papers had some code and data posted but only 31 could be fully rerun, and that at least one error of some type was identified in more than half of the papers, including one substantial upstream bug that may warrant correction or retraction. The audit also surfaced privacy lapses, with identifiers and persistent IDs reaching repositories, which he says have been remediated and reported to the appropriate data protection office. He calls the exercise disturbing and proposes routine AI-assisted pre-submission audits and automated repository checks.