iCreatAI News
Skip to content
Trending storyWatching

Opinion says AI progress mostly comes from diligence rather than superhuman intelligence

1 reports1 sources3 days agoUpdated

Understand this story

AI overview

An opinion holds that many of the impressive feats of large language models (LLMs) come from speed, diligence, and basic competence rather than superhuman intelligence. The opinion illustrates this with three cases: GPT Astra's ability to understand and modify a neural network from scratch is said to rely on off-the-shelf interpretability techniques and shortcuts humans would also use; Claude helping someone recover $400,000 worth of Bitcoin relied on traversing files, combining passwords and keys, and fixing a configuration bug; and OpenAI once orchestrated 10,000 agents collaborating for 88 hours to solve a Millennium Prize problem, which the author sees as closer to "artificial diligence" than special optimization capability. All of the above judgments come from the author of this opinion; the report provides no independent verification.

AI overview based on source reports · Updated 3 days ago

Coverage timeline

Follow the coverage to explore different perspectives.

Nov 11
  1. Hacker News AI
    A lot of AI progress is just persistence

    The author argues that much of the hype around LLMs stems not from superhuman intelligence but from their willingness to tirelessly attempt tedious tasks, citing examples like Claude recovering $400,000 in Bitcoin through brute-force search and optimizing ML architectures through sheer volume of attempts. While acknowledging genuinely impressive recent results like OpenAI's Millennium problem work, the piece contends there is no proof AI has special ability to optimize neural networks or reverse engineer programs, and that artificial diligence explains a large fraction of perceived capability.

Activity for this story

Current comparable activity
3
Peak comparable activity
10Nov 12 00:00
Change in the past 24 hours
-51%

Trends compare the same fully observed participants, which may cover fewer participants than current activity. Move the pointer or tap the chart to inspect hourly activity; use the left and right arrow keys with a keyboard.