Engineer questions AI executives' claim that AI could exterminate humanity
Understand this story
A software engineer wrote an article rebutting statements by Anthropic and OpenAI executives that AI could exterminate humanity, pointing out that Evan Hubinger's claimed "over 10% probability within ten years" and Dario Amodei's claimed "25% probability" are supported by no paper, modeling, or timeline. The article argues that such predictions lack evidence and questions whether their motives may involve entrenching monopoly positions through strict regulation and suppressing open-source models.
AI overview based on source reports · Updated 2 hr ago
Coverage timeline
Follow the coverage to explore different perspectives.
- Hacker News AIAn AI Rant
A software engineer pushes back on claims from AI leaders that advanced AI poses a high risk of human extinction, arguing that figures like Anthropic's Evan Hubinger and Dario Amodei offer no evidence or modeling behind their 10% and 25% estimates. He contends the doomer narrative rests on speculative assumptions about superintelligence and questions the motives behind it, while warning that halting AI development would push the US and world economies into recession.
Activity for this story
Not enough continuous observations to show a trend yet.