Entrepreneur questions whether non-frontier AI startups should stay in San Francisco
Understand this story
An entrepreneur publicly questioned: if it's not a frontier AI lab, what benefit is there to setting up a startup in San Francisco. He said that outside frontier labs and their alumni companies, the quality of talent is not necessarily better than elsewhere in the world, yet the cost is double, and people often leave after just 6 months for the next hot startup. He is therefore considering starting up in tech hubs such as Los Angeles, London, Berlin, or Tallinn. This question is about the location of non-frontier AI startups, not all AI companies.
AI overview based on source reports · Updated 2 days ago
Coverage timeline
Follow the coverage to explore different perspectives.
- Hacker News AIWhat benefit does a San Francisco HQ offer if you are not a frontier AI lab?
A Hacker News poster questions whether basing a startup in San Francisco makes sense for companies that are not frontier AI labs, arguing that talent outside those labs and their alumni-founded companies may be no better than elsewhere while demanding a steep "SF premium" and leaving after about six months. The poster suggests other tech hubs such as LA, London, Berlin or Tallinn could offer more value for the money.
Activity for this story
- Current comparable activity
- 3
- Peak comparable activity
- 10Nov 12 16:00
- Change in the past 24 hours
- -51%
Trends compare the same fully observed participants, which may cover fewer participants than current activity. Move the pointer or tap the chart to inspect hourly activity; use the left and right arrow keys with a keyboard.