Ideo designer: whether an AI feature helps users complete tasks should be the standard
Understand this story
Savannah Kunovsky, head of Ideo's industrial product design team, proposes that the standard for judging whether an AI feature is just a gimmick is whether it can help users do what they want to do. She cites the Humane AI Pin as an example, saying it replaced familiar interfaces with slower, less reliable interactions; when cars moved air conditioning and volume controls into touchscreens, drivers were forced to take their eyes off the road, and Europe's Euro NCAP therefore began giving extra points to models that retain physical buttons. She suggests product teams first clarify user needs, then decide whether AI should play a core, supporting, or absent role in the interaction, rather than using AI to replace things that already work well.
AI overview based on source reports · Updated 2 days ago
Coverage timeline
Follow the coverage to explore different perspectives.
- Hacker News AISmarter AI Product Design Centers the User's Real Needs
In an IEEE Spectrum interview, IDEO industrial design lead Savannah Kunovsky explains how companies pressured to add AI often replace interfaces that already work, citing Humane's AI Pin and knobless cooktops as failures, and argues designers should start from user needs rather than technical feasibility. She describes how generative AI's nondeterminism shifts product definition toward evaluations and constitutions, and why fast, obvious human override is essential to consumer trust.
Activity for this story
- Current comparable activity
- 3
- Peak comparable activity
- 10Nov 12 23:00
- Change in the past 24 hours
- -50%
Trends compare the same fully observed participants, which may cover fewer participants than current activity. Move the pointer or tap the chart to inspect hourly activity; use the left and right arrow keys with a keyboard.