iCreatAI News
Skip to content
Trending storyWatching

AI agents “discovering” a Maya site is called an already-published result

3 reports2 sources2 days agoUpdated

Understand this story

AI overview

Google researcher Pietro Miotti says he used 48 AI agents to analyze publicly available NASA lidar data, screening out suspected structures across about 1,200 square kilometers of jungle in Mexico and pinpointing a clifftop site that he describes as containing a plaza, an 8–12-meter-high pyramid, and courtyards. He submitted a report to Mexico's National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH), which replied that the location has no registered archaeological site. But according to The Verge, this site was published in an academic journal more than a year ago. Archaeologists criticized Miotti for not checking existing research and for mistaking “unregistered” for “undiscovered”; Miotti acknowledged that the agents struggled to match coordinates in the paper's images and has updated his blog. Whether the site is indeed a Maya ruin still awaits verification by INAH. Mexican law stipulates that archaeological sites are under federal protection and that fieldwork must be authorized by INAH, so whether to send a team is decided by the local INAH center. On this basis, Miotti had argued that the agents' capabilities have moved beyond coding and mathematics and can transfer to broader scientific research.

AI overview based on source reports · Updated 2 days ago

Developments

2 developments

  1. Nov 13 03:42 · 1 reports
    AI agent's false report of discovering a known Maya site sparks controversy
    The Verge · AI:No, AI agents did not discover a previously unknown Maya site
  2. Nov 11 05:04 · 2 reports
    Using AI agents to analyze NASA lidar data to discover a Maya site
    Hacker News AI:Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmapped Maya pyramid in 72h

Coverage timeline

Follow the coverage to explore different perspectives.

Nov 13
  1. The Verge · AI
    No, AI agents did not discover a previously unknown Maya site

    Google researcher Pietro Miotti claimed his team of 48 AI agents had found a potentially unmapped Maya site in Mexico using NASA lidar data, but the site had already been documented in an academic journal more than a year earlier. Archaeologists criticized the claim, noting that a site missing from Mexico's INAH records is not necessarily unknown, and that lidar and remote sensing have long been used in the field. Miotti, who stressed he is not an archaeologist, said he updated his post and blog to credit the earlier work and acknowledged expert knowledge is needed to verify what the agents find.

Nov 11
  1. Hacker News AIFeatured
    Google SWE points 48 AI agents at NASA Lidar, finds unmapped Maya pyramid in 72h

    A Google software engineer describes using 48 AI agents to review public NASA lidar imagery of roughly 1,200 km² of Maya jungle, flagging structures including a hilltop site with a levelled plaza, an oval pyramid at least 8–12 m tall and a possible water reservoir. After checking the literature and archives, the author sent a report to Mexico's INAH, which replied that no registered archaeological site was identified at the location. The author stresses the find is not official and offers to help with an INAH-led field check.

  2. Hacker News AI
    My AI Agents Found an Unmapped Maya Site in Mexico

    The author describes using AI agents to analyze NASA lidar data covering about 1,200 km² of jungle, where the agents flagged structures including a hilltop site with a plaza, an oval pyramid at least 8–12 m tall, a raised courtyard and a possible water reservoir. After checking the literature and archives, the author sent a report to Mexico's INAH, which replied that no registered archaeological site was identified at the location. The author, who states he is not an archaeologist, offers to help with an INAH-led field check and notes the site's identification remains unofficial.

Activity for this story

Current comparable activity
3
Peak comparable activity
14Nov 13 04:00
Change in the past 24 hours
-51%

Trends compare the same fully observed participants, which may cover fewer participants than current activity. Move the pointer or tap the chart to inspect hourly activity; use the left and right arrow keys with a keyboard.